Legal Opinion

People v. Carmody

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 23, 2011PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum:

Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of rape in the third degree (Penal Law § 130.25 [2]) and criminal sexual act in the third degree (§ 130.40 [2]). To the extent that defendant’s contention that he was denied effective assistance of counsel survives his guilty plea (see People v Bethune, 21 AD3d 1316 [2005], lv denied 6 NY3d 752 [2005]), that contention lacks merit (see generally People v Ford, 86 NY2d 397, 404 [1995]). Defendant received “an advantageous plea and nothing in the record casts doubt on the apparent effectiveness of counsel”…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. FordNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. People v. BethuneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. WordenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  2. WORDEN, ROBERT L., PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API