Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hutchison v. Tompkins

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 14, 1970No. 69-163Published

1DissentWalden, Judge

Upon defendant’s motion the trial court dismissed Count I of plaintiff’s Amended Complaint because of its failure to state a cause of action. The case of Pembroke v. *183Caudill, 1948, 160 Fla. 948, 37 So.2d 5381 was cited as the basis for the dismissal and judgment was entered thereupon for the defendants. A majority of this Court has approved this manner of disposition.

The simple issue then and now is: “Does Count I of the Amended Complaint state a cause of action?” Being satisfied beyond all doubt that it was legally sufficient, I must dissent and say that I would reverse the trial court…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Hyman v. CohenSupreme Court of Florida · 1954
  2. Benedict Pineapple Co. v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of Florida · 1908
  3. Erick Bowman Remedy Co. v. Jensen Salsbery Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
  4. Warfield v. HepburnSupreme Court of Florida · 1911
  5. Pembroke v. CaudillSupreme Court of Florida · 1948

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API