Milanovich v. State

RUFFIN, Chief Judge.

We granted Gregory Milanovich’s application for discretionary appeal in which he challenges the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the trial court’s revocation of his probation. Milanovich also argues that the trial court erred in failing to consider alternatives to incarceration. We affirm.

1. In determining whether a probationer has violated the terms of his probation, a trial court employs the “preponderance of the evidence” standard.1 On appeal, we will not interfere with a lower court’s revocation of probation absent manifest abuse of discretion.2

So viewed, the…