Legal Opinion

Cuddihy Corp. v. Plummer

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided April 28, 1994No. 13-92-565-CVPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON MOTIONS FOR REHEARING

DORSEY, Justice.

Two motions for rehearing have been filed: one by appellant Cuddihy Corporation and one by cross-appellant Wes Plummer, individually. We overrule Cuddihy Corporation’s Motion for Rehearing, but grant Plum-mer’s. Upon reconsideration of Plummer’s points of error, we withdraw part of our opinion and substitute the following on his cross-appeal.

Cross-appellant, Plummer, appeals from the granting of summary judgment against him on his claims against Tennessee Pipeline Construction Company (Tennessee). The summary judgment was interlocutory 2 and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Gibbs v. General Motors CorporationTexas Supreme Court · 1970
  4. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. S.S.Texas Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Swilley v. HughesTexas Supreme Court · 1972

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Case Corp. v. Hi-Class Business Systems of America, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2006
  2. Garrod Investments, Inc. v. Schlegel, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2004
  3. Bomar v. Walls Regional Hospital, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1998
  4. Garrod Investments, Inc. v. Robert Schlegel and Myrna Schlegel, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API