Cuddihy Corp. v. Plummer
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON MOTIONS FOR REHEARING
DORSEY, Justice.
Two motions for rehearing have been filed: one by appellant Cuddihy Corporation and one by cross-appellant Wes Plummer, individually. We overrule Cuddihy Corporation’s Motion for Rehearing, but grant Plum-mer’s. Upon reconsideration of Plummer’s points of error, we withdraw part of our opinion and substitute the following on his cross-appeal.
Cross-appellant, Plummer, appeals from the granting of summary judgment against him on his claims against Tennessee Pipeline Construction Company (Tennessee). The summary judgment was interlocutory 2 and…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
- Gibbs v. General Motors CorporationTexas Supreme Court · 1970
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. S.S.Texas Supreme Court · 1993
- Swilley v. HughesTexas Supreme Court · 1972
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Case Corp. v. Hi-Class Business Systems of America, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2006
- Garrod Investments, Inc. v. Schlegel, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2004
- Bomar v. Walls Regional Hospital, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1998
- Garrod Investments, Inc. v. Robert Schlegel and Myrna Schlegel, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2004