Legal Opinion
Cobell v. Norton
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided March 5, 2003No. CIV.A.96-1285 (RCL)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*49 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
LAMBERTH, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on Interior defendants’ motion for a protective order regarding documents requested by the Special Master-Monitor (“Monitor”) and regarding the rule announced by the Monitor concerning deposition questioning [1747], which was filed on January 23, 2003. Upon consideration of defendants’ motion, plaintiffs’ opposition thereto, defendants’ reply brief, and the applicable law, the Court finds that defendants’ motion should be denied.
I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
On April 16, 2001, with the consent of both parties, the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- David R. Ruiz, United States of America, Intervenor-Appellee v. W. J. Estelle, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- David R. Ruiz, United States of America, Intervenor-Appellee v. W. J. Estelle, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Richard A. HornCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Burlington Insurance v. Okie Dokie, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Chaplaincy of Full Gospel Churches v. JohnsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003