Legal Opinion

Coogan v. Burley

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided November 12, 1926PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

In this case Bill was filed to enforce the specific performance of option under which the appellants claimed the right to purchase and to have conveyed to them from the appellee certain lands. There are thirteen (13)^ Assignments of Error, each of which is addressed to the findings of the Chancellor as obtained in the final decree.

It is not needful for us to say that we concur in each and every of the findings of the Chancellor. All the stated findings of the Chancellor were not essential to constitute the basis of the final decree which was entered.

The evidence is conflicting.

In an equity…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wimbish v. DouglassSupreme Court of Florida · 1926

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Thomas v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1934
  2. Maxwell v. Smith, Et Ux.Supreme Court of Florida · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API