Legal Opinion

Gleason v. Hastings

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 7, 1932PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Field, J. Deming J.

Hastings died May 9, 1896. By his will, which was duly allowed, he gave the residue of his estate to a trustee “to pay over the net income thereof semi-annually, quarterly, or oftener if he deems it .expedient so to do, to my son Addison T. Hastings and Albert J. Hastings, and my grandson Jasper H. Adams, one third to each, during their lives, and upon the decease of either to pay over his share of said income to his lawful issue, if any, in equal shares, and in case of the death of either, leaving no lawful issue, to pay his share of said income to the survivors in equal…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Manning v. ManningMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
  2. Anderson v. BeanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
  3. Dole v. KeyesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
  4. Cammann v. AbbeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
  5. Gardiner v. EverettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Boston Safe Deposit & Trust Co. v. StoneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
  2. Agricultural National Bank v. SchwartzMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
  3. B. M. C. Durfee Trust Co. v. BordenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952
  4. Agricultural National Bank v. MillerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  5. Welch v. PhinneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API