Legal Opinion
Elyse v. Bridgeside Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided March 1, 2010No. 08-3430-cvUnpublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SUMMARY ORDER
Plaintiff-Appellant Macsen Elyse, pro se, appeals from a June 2008 decision of the district court, denying his motions to alter or amend the judgment, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e), or for a partial new trial on the issue of damages, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(a). We assume the parties’ familiarity with the facts and procedural history of the case.
Elyse principally challenges the district court’s denial of his motion for either (1) an alteration or amendment of the judgment to increase the damages award from $18,000.00 to $227,057.96, or…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Tennant v. Peoria & Pekin Union Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Dimick v. SchiedtSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Karen SORLUCCO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NEW YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Metromedia Co. v. FugazyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Dr. Judith Piesco v. Edward I. Koch, the City of New York, Department of Personnel, Juan Ortiz and Nicholas Laporte, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Antilles School, Inc. v. LembachSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2016
- Frank Sloup and Crabs Unlimited, LLC v. LoefflerDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2010
- Leo v. Long Island RailroadDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Carlton v. C.O. PearsonDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2019
- Humphrey v. Waterbury P. D.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.