Legal Opinion

M. A. B. v. Buell

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 6, 2019No. A166273PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHadlock, P. J.

*466*381Petitioner and respondent were married in 2014 and they have one young child, J. Petitioner separated from respondent in July 2017, and she and J moved in with petitioner's parents. In October of that year, petitioner sought and obtained a restraining order against respondent under the Family Abuse Prevention Act (FAPA), ORS 107.700 to 107.735. On respondent's appeal, we conclude that petitioner did not meet her burden of proving that she was in imminent danger of further abuse from respondent at the time of the FAPA hearing. Accordingly, we reverse.

We review the trial court's legal…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hubbell v. SandersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  2. Hannemann v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  3. Vanik-Burns v. BurnsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  4. J. K. v. KargolCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  5. Valenti v. AckleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. M. A. B. v. BuellOregon Supreme Court · 2020
  2. K. E. B. v. BradleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
  3. K. E. B. v. BradleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
  4. P. K. W. v. SteagallCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API