May v. . Menzies
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
The facts essential are set forth in the opinion.
This case was before this Court at Fall Term, 1922. (See 184 N.C. 150.)
The court below, in that case, nonsuited the plaintiff, and a new trial was granted by this Court. Adams, J., for the Court, clearly and concisely states the law applicable, and then the facts on which a new trial was granted, as follows: "Inspection of the record and examination of the briefs filed by counsel lead to the conclusion that the controversy as to the alleged acceptance should have been submitted to the jury. There is evidence tending to show that on 6 February…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Currie v. Golconda Mining & Milling Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- Page v. . McDonaldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
- Patton v. Sinclaire Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
- Best v. British & American Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1901
- Shober v. . WheelerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. Citizens and Southern National Bank of Atlanta, GeorgiaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1966
- United States v. Citizens & Southern National BankCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1966