Morin's Case
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the CourtMorrill, J.
This case is under the Workmen’s Compensation Act; the injury was received prior to the revision of that Act by the Legislature of 1919.
*340The petition is manifestly insufficient on its face to support any award of compensation, for the following reasons:(a) The appeal filed by the employer and insurance carrier, upon which the case is before us, refers to the petition as a “petition for review.” But an examination will show that it is not a petition for review under Section 36, because it contains no reference whatever to any “agreement, award, findings or decree,” of which review is asked ‘…
2Cited by11 opinions
- Lindblom v. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 1930
- White v. Monmouth Canning CompanySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1967
- O'Malley v. MacK International Motor Truck Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1930
- Robbins v. Bates Fabrics, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
- Union Trust Co. of Ellsworth v. HardySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.