Legal Opinion

Morin's Case

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided March 15, 1923PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorrill, J.

This case is under the Workmen’s Compensation Act; the injury was received prior to the revision of that Act by the Legislature of 1919.

*340The petition is manifestly insufficient on its face to support any award of compensation, for the following reasons:(a) The appeal filed by the employer and insurance carrier, upon which the case is before us, refers to the petition as a “petition for review.” But an examination will show that it is not a petition for review under Section 36, because it contains no reference whatever to any “agreement, award, findings or decree,” of which review is asked ‘…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Lindblom v. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 1930
  2. White v. Monmouth Canning CompanySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1967
  3. O'Malley v. MacK International Motor Truck Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1930
  4. Robbins v. Bates Fabrics, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
  5. Union Trust Co. of Ellsworth v. HardySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API