Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hummer v. Levin

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided March 21, 1996No. 93-CV-721Published

1DissentKing, Associate Judge

This case was tried twice with a plaintiffs verdict each time. The verdict in the first trial was larger than the verdict in the second trial and plaintiff understandably seeks reinstatement of the first verdict. Two trials were held because, after the first trial, the trial judge granted the defense motion for a new trial, concluding that he had incorrectly barred testimony of two defense witnesses bearing on the issue of liability. The majority holds that the trial judge abused discretion in ordering the new trial on that ground. I disagree and, therefore, respectfully dissent.

Before…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Laumer v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Rich v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Rein J. Vander Zee v. Kimon T. KarabatsosCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979
  4. Lyons v. BarrazottoDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Watts v. SmithDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1967

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API