Legal Opinion
Burbach v. SUSSEX CTY. MUN. UTIL. AUTH.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided February 17, 1999PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
723 A.2d 137 (1999)
318 N.J. Super. 228
Bridgett Podeszwa BURBACH, and Theodore F. Beck, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
SUSSEX COUNTY MUNICIPAL UTILITIES AUTHORITY, Public Body Corporate of the State of New Jersey, Defendant-Respondent.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Submitted February 2, 1999
Decided February 17, 1999
Kron & Correale, Succasunna, for plaintiffs-appellants (Larry I. Kron, on the brief).
Fitzgibbons & Goovaerts, Franklin, for defendant-respondent (William F. Fitzgibbons, of counsel and on the brief).
Before Judges PRESSLER, KLEINER and STEINBERG.
The opinion of the court…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Mennonite Board of Missions v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Newman v. ChaseSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1976
- New Brunswick Savings Bank v. MarkouskiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
- Orange Land Company v. BenderNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- CITIZENS BANK OF PENNSYLVANIA VS. METODI A. DONCHEV (F-021911-12, GLOUCESTER COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (CONSOLIDATED)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2018