Legal Opinion
Howarth v. Segal
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 23, 1964No. Civ. A. No. 29461PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HIGGINBOTHAM, District Judge.
Defendant, Alexander Segal, has moved1 to dismiss plaintiffs’ complaint on the ground that the amount in controversy as to each plaintiff does not exceed $10,000.00 2.
Plaintiff, Hugh Howarth, alleges inter alia that he and his wife reside at 219 Winding Way Road, Stratford, New Jersey; that he is a dentist presently serving as an officer in the United States Navy; that the defendant appeared before a magistrate without probable cause and charged plaintiffs with the crimes of larceny and receiving stolen goods — more specifically the act charged was that plaintiffs…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Frederick Hart & Co. v. Recordgraph CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
- Thelma M. Wade, as Administratrix of the Estate of Russell L. Smith, Deceased v. Dan Rogala, Doing Business as Rogala FisheriesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1959
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Daley v. John Wanamaker, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Shelton v. EvansSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Dowling v. J. C. Penney Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1969
- Daley v. John Wanamaker, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Shelton v. EvansSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.