Parkchester Apartments Co. v. Heim
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Order dated September 24, 1992 affirmed, with $10 costs.
In this nonpayment summary proceeding commenced in December 1991, tenant Heim experienced difficulty in arranging for assistance from the Department of Social Services, resulting in his default in payments required under three separate stipulations of settlement. The entire amount of the outstanding arrears and all ancillary fees were tendered to the landlord on or about September 29, 1992, within eight days of the due date agreed upon in the parties’ final stipulation. While there was delay in the resolution of this…
3Cited by7 opinions
- 102-116 Eighth Avenue Associates, L.P. v. OyolaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Harvey 1390 LLC v. BodenheimAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Harvey 1390 LLC v. BodenheimAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2010
- 210 Realty Associates v. O'ConnorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Archstone Camargue I LLC v. KorteAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.