Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Moxley

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided February 2, 1926No. 4 Div. 160Published

1Opinion

On Rehearing.

It is now urgently insisted that the statement of facts in the original opinion be amended to conform to appellant's contention so as to show that plaintiff, at the time of bringing this suit, owned six-tenths of the fee instead of seven-tenths. This is true, and the original statement is amended in that respect, although the evidence shows that plaintiff later acquired other interest, which cannot be here considered. In passing upon the questions presented by this appeal, this court attached no importance to the amount of interest held by plaintiff. As we see this appeal, it…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Smyth v. TankersleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1852
  2. Crosby v. LoopIllinois Supreme Court · 1852
  3. Smith's Executors v. WileySupreme Court of Alabama · 1853
  4. Tankersley v. ChildersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1853
  5. Bowser v. CoxIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API