Garcia-Carrillo v. State

Boggs, Judge.

Manuel Garcia-Carrillo appeals from his convictions of trafficking in cocaine, driving without a license, and following too closely. He contends that the trial court erred by denying his motion to suppress and by admitting into evidence three post-arrest telephone conversations recorded through a wiretap. He also asserts that his trafficking conviction must be reversed as a result of insufficient evidence of identity. For the reasons explained below, we affirm.

When reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence,

the relevant question is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light…