Rhone Poulenc, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
DiCARLO, Judge.
PQ Corp., the petitioner in the underlying antidumping investigation, moves pursuant to Rule 24(a) of the Rules of this Court and 28 U.S.C. § 2631(j)(l)(B) to intervene as of right in this challenge to the results of an administrative review of an antidumping duty order. Plaintiffs, Rhone Poulenc Inc. and Rhone Poulenc Chimie de Base, oppose intervention, arguing that PQ may not intervene as of right or by leave of the Court because it failed to participate in the administrative review under challenge.
The Court holds that, under 19 C.F.R. § 353.12(i) (1988), the regulation in…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Bowen v. Georgetown University HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Manuli Autoadesivi, S.P.A. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1985
3Cited by8 opinions
- Brother Industries, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1991
- Shakeproof Assembly Components Division of Illinois Tool Works, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2000
- Usec Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2003
- California Industrial Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2004
- Jtekt Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2011
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.