Legal Opinion

Humphrey v. Onaway-Alpena Telephone Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 27, 1918No. Docket No. 10PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Alpena; Emerick, J. Assumpsit by Henry Humphrey against the Onaway-Alpena Telephone Company for services rendered. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtSteere, J.

Plaintiff recovered a verdict and judgment in the circuit court of Alpena county in the sum of $500 claimed as balance due him under employment by defendant, as special accountant, or auditor. Admitting service by him in that capacity under terms which are partially in dispute defendant contends as a matter of fact and law that full payment had been made for all services rendered. The defendant Qnaway-Alpena Telephone Co. was promoted and incorporated with a view to acquiring and holding the franchises and property of three less pretentious organizations known as the Onaway Telephone Co., The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hurley v. WatsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Clark v. Onaway-Alpena Telephone Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hall v. Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Sadowski v. General Discount Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API