Legal Opinion
Hall & McChesney, Inc. v. State
New York Court of Claims
Decided February 12, 1959No. Claim No. 34017PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRichard S. Heller, J.
TMs claim arises from the appropriation of property for purposes connected with the State arterial highways passing through cities pursuant to article 12-B of the Highway Law.
Prior to the taking, claimant owned a plot of land located at the southwest corner of Court Street and Oswego Boulevard in the City of Syracuse. This plot had a frontage on Oswego Boulevard of approximately 401 feet, a frontage on Court Street of about 213 feet, and a frontage on North Clinton Street of about 397 feet. The entire plot contained 92,087 square feet.
Claimant operated its business consisting largely of photo…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Van Aken v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
- McHale v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
- McHale v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
3Cited by9 opinions
- La Briola v. State of NYNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Selig v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
- Baldwin-Hall Co. v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
- Cousin v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1972
- Jamaica Chamber of Commerce, Inc. v. Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityNew York Supreme Court · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.