Legal Opinion · Dissent

Kirkendall v. Decker

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 10, 1999No. S99A0088Published

1DissentThompson, Justice

The decree in question ordered Kirkendall to make Decker the beneficiary of life insurance “which he maintains through Delta Air Lines, Inc.” It is undisputed that, at the time of the entry of the decree, the only “life insurance” policy which Kirkendall carried *192through Delta was an accidental death policy. In my view, inasmuch as the decree did not require Kirkendall to maintain a whole life or term life insurance policy, the trial court erred in holding Kirkendall in contempt for failing to maintain such a policy. See Perry v. Perry, 265 Ga. 186,188 (3) (454 SE2d 122) (1995) (trial court…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Reeves v. ReevesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976
  2. Perry v. PerrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1995
  3. Chandler v. RatcliffeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API