Jones v. Spradlin
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtSamford, J.
The judgment from which this appeal is taken having been in favor of plaintiff, rulings of the trial court bearing on defendant’s liability and not affecting the amount of recovery will not be considered as reversible error. Holloway et al v. Henderson Lumber Co., 203 Ala. 246, 82 South. 344.
The following excerpt from the court’s general charge will serve to illustrate the view taken by the trial court in charging the jury, to wit:
' “If, when Spradlin spoke this (meaning the slanderous language set out in the complaint), it was untrue when he said he was, a rascal, if he said that and meant…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Starks v. ComerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
- Smith Bros. v. Agee & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1912
- Yakavicze v. ValentukeviciousSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1911
- Fawsett v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1878
- Holloway v. Henderson Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1919
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Austin v. Tennessee Biscuit Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1951
- Odum v. ColdwellAlabama Court of Appeals · 1925