Blickenstaff v. Cowgill
Indiana Court of Appeals
Prom Wabash Circuit Court; A. H. Plummer, Judge. Action by Joseph C. Blickenstaff against Cary E. Cow-gill and others. From a judgment of dismissal, the plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtIbach, P. J.
This is a companion ease to Hornaday v. Cowgill (1913), 54 Ind. App. 631, 101 N. E. 1030. The only question brought before us in the present ease is the action of the trial court in dismissing the case, upon appellees’ motion, for want of prosecution, and in refusing, upon appellant’s motion, to reinstate the case.
The complaint was filed on July 7, 1909. On September 15, 1910, appellees filed demurrers to the complaint. On January 15, 1912, the issues not having been advanced, and no steps having been taken by appellant to advance the issues in the cause, appellees made a motion to dismiss…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mowry v. WeisenbornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Kubli v. HawkettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Cabinet Makers' Union v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
- Langford v. MurpheyWashington Supreme Court · 1902
- Simmons v. KellerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Swain v. City of PrincetonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1970
- Slagle v. ValenzianoIndiana Court of Appeals · 1963
- Capital Savings Bank & Trust Co. v. HammettSupreme Court of Vermont · 1921
- Burton v. RyanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1929
- Slagle v. ValenzianoIndiana Court of Appeals · 1963
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.