Legal Opinion

Keklah v. Gebert's Floor Coverings

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 14, 1994No. C7-93-1193PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COYNE, Justice.

The Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals reversed the compensation judge’s determination that employee worked in the construction industry and that he was entitled to economic recovery compensation. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.

In 1979, David Keklah started working as a carpet installer with a commercial installation company that dealt primarily in new construction. He was a member of a union, Twin Cities Carpet and Linoleum and Resilient Tile Layers, Local 596, a division of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America. In 1987, he started…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Berry v. Walker Roofing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
  2. Clabo v. Bor-Son Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  3. Julius v. LenzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gackstetter v. Johnson/Midwest Coca Cola BottlingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
  2. Rogholt v. Knight ElectricSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API