Brady v. Consolidated Traction Co.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On rule to show cause why a new trial should not be granted.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Dixon, J.
In this case the plaintiff sued to recover compensation for injuries resulting from a collision with a car of the defendant in December, 1897. He having obtained a *26verdict, the trial justice allowed a rule to show cause why the verdict should not be set aside.
The testimony shows that, -between three and four o’clock in the afternoon, as the car was going up Newark avenue in Jersey City, on the northerly track, the plaintiff, a boy about nine and a half years old, playing with other boys, ran down the avenue on the southerly side and then…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- West Jersey Railroad v. EwanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1893
3Cited by3 opinions
- Schoonover v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1911
- Brady v. Consolidated Traction Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1900
- Fitzhenry v. Consolidated Traction Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1900