Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Earl Ray Lyell v. Paul Renico

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided December 1, 2006No. 04-1106Published

1ConcurrenceClay, Circuit Judge

I join the majority opinion’s holding that Lyell’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus should be granted as a result of the trial court’s expressions of bias which denied Lyell a fair trial, but write separately with respect to the trial court’s apparent coercion of the jury as a result of the trial court’s improper polling of the jury. I would find that the trial court’s improper polling and inadequate Allen charge are also bases for granting Lyell’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus.

The instant case arguably represents the most objectionable form of polling conceivable prior to a court…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lowenfield v. PhelpsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Brasfield v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. United States v. Antonio Luis BurgosCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
  4. United States v. Francis G. BrooksCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
  5. United States v. Peter SpitzCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API