Legal Opinion

Umlauf v. County of Chautauqua

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 7, 1984PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: Within two days of its entry, defendant moved to vacate a default judgment taken against it by plaintiff. Defendant concedes that its failure to serve an answer after plaintiff had consented to an extension of time may only be characterized as law office failure. Nevertheless, Special Term was empowered to excuse the default (CPLR 2005). Given the well-established policy favoring dispositions on the merits, the lack of any prejudice to plaintiff, and the possible merit of the defenses which defendant seeks to assert, Special Term did not…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Aces Mechanical Corp. v. Cohen Bros. Realty & Construction Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sanders v. SandersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  2. Howlan v. RosolAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  3. Goldsmith Motors Corp. v. Chemical BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  4. Vanek v. Mercy HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  5. Pickney v. WoodAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API