Legal Opinion

Duggan v. Hyland

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 5, 1975PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: Plaintiffs-appellants, Margaret and James Duggan, commenced an action against defendants-respondents, Charles and Marjorie Hyland, for the removal of an encroaching structure, to wit, defendants’ driveway, pursuant to article 8 of the Real Property Actions and Proceedings Law. Plaintiffs demanded a judgment directing the removal of an asphalt driveway so far as the same encroaches upon plaintiffs’ premises and for the sum of $500 damages to plaintiffs’ hedge. The trial court dismissed plaintiffs’ complaint for failure of proof. We…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. White's Bank of Buffalo v. . NicholsNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  2. Sheridan v. CardwellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
  3. Tietjen v. PalmerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
  4. Judd v. ChilsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Greenman v. City of CortlandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  2. O'Brien v. Town of HuntingtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  3. Salerno v. C.E. Kiff, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  4. SalernovC.E.Kiff,Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  5. Schwartzberg v. Shek Cheung LuiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API