Legal Opinion
Ropfogel v. United States
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided August 1, 1991No. Civ. A. No. 88-1070-TPublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
THEIS, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on the following motions filed by the defendant (hereinafter the government or the United States): (1) motion for leave to withdraw admissions (Doc. 66); (2) motion to compel (Doc. 68); and (3) motion to compel compli-anee with court order (Doc. 69). The government has also requested oral argument (Doc. 78). The court does not believe oral argument would be of assistance in deciding these motions and therefore denies the request.
This is an income tax refund case. The original plaintiff was Lucille S. Bennett (Mrs.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Brook Village North Associates v. General Electric Company, Re-Entry and Environmental Systems DivisionCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
- 999, a Corporation, Plaintiff/appellee/cross-Appellant v. C.I.T. Corporation, a Corporation, Defendant/appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Smith v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- Virginia M. Gutting v. Falstaff Brewing Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
- Deborah D. Bergemann v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Richard Prusia, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Richard PrusiaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
- P.W.P. v. L.S.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1998
- North Louisiana Rehabilitation Center, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2001
- O'Neill v. MedadDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1996
- Kutscherousky v. Integrated Comm. Sol., Unpublished Decision (8-15-2005)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2005
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.