Legal Opinion

Stephens v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 21, 1989No. 88-102PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

We granted the writ of certiorari to review the judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals, which reversed Edward Earnest Stephens's conviction of first degree robbery. The issue to be addressed is whether the trial court erred in failing to recite verbatim Stephens's requested jury charge regarding corroboration testimony when the court instructed the jury on that issue. The Court of Criminal Appeals cited Chavers v.State, 361 So.2d 1106 (Ala. 1978), and Roy v. State,375 So.2d 1289 (Ala.Crim.App. 1979), in support of its decision that the trial court's refusal to give Stephens's requested…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Chavers v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
  2. McCoy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1981
  3. Thompson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  4. Lambeth v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  5. Lundy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sharpe v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1989
  2. Reuther v. City of LeedsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1992
  3. Edwards v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1990
  4. Stephens v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API