Legal Opinion
State v. PUBLIC STAFF-NC UTIL. COM'N
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided July 28, 1988No. 108A87PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
370 S.E.2d 567 (1988)
322 N.C. 689
STATE of North Carolina ex rel. UTILITIES COMMISSION; and Duke Power Company
v.
PUBLIC STAFF-NORTH CAROLINA UTILITIES COMMISSION (Appellant); and
Lacy H. Thornburg, Attorney General; City of Durham; and Wells Eddleman (Cross-Appellants).
No. 108A87.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
July 28, 1988.
James D. Little, Staff Atty., Raleigh, for Public Staff Legal Div., North Carolina Utilities Com'n, appellant.
Lacy H. Thornburg, Atty. Gen. by Jo Anne Sanford, Sp. Deputy Atty. Gen., and Karen E. Long, Asst. Atty. Gen., Raleigh, for Atty. Gen. Lacy H. Thornburg and City of…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Smyth v. AmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Smyth v. Ames; Smyth v. Smith; Smyth v. HigginsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. General Telephone Co. of the SoutheastSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Hogan v. Cone Mills Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission & Duke Power Co. v. EddlemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re E.D.H.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2022
- In re E.D.H.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2022
- Nay v. Cornerstone Staffing Sols.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2022
- Nay v. Cornerstone Staffing Sols.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2022