Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Brush v. New York Suburban Water Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 7, 1899PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from special term, Westchester county. Complaint by the people, on the relation of Edward F. Brush, for a writ of mandamus to compel the New York Suburban Water Company to furnish relator with pure water, and on reasonable terms. From a judgment overruling a demurrer to the alternative writ, defendant appeals.'

1Opinion of the CourtCullen, J.

The appellant is a water company, incorporated under the general statute, and under a contract with the city of Mt. Vernon •to furnish a supply of water to the inhabitants of that city. The relator, an inhabitant of Mt. Vernon, on a complaint that the appellant failed to furnish him and the other inhabitants of the city with pure water; that it charged exorbitant prices for the water furnished; that, instead of charging for the water according to the quantity consumed, it fixed its charges according to the number of taps, faucets, •or openings in the different buildings; and that it required…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Attorney-General v. New York, Lake Erie & Western R. R.New York Court of Appeals · 1887
  2. People ex rel. McGrath v. Green Island Water Co.New York Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Seymour Water Co. v. City of SeymourIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
  2. State ex rel. City of Marion v. Marion Light & Heating Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Washington ex rel. City of Seattle v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1924
  4. Plainfield-Union Water Co. v. Inhabitants of City of PlainfieldSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API