Legal Opinion

Ramon v. Chavira

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 26, 1979No. 1455PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BISSETT, Justice.

Appellants have filed a motion to reverse the judgment of the trial court and remand the case due to their inability to obtain a complete statement of facts. A partial statement of facts has been filed. Appellants state, however, that testimony and court rulings adduced at a hearing on their amended motion for new trial are essential to their appeal, a portion of which concerns alleged jury misconduct. The former official court reporter was present and reported the hearing.

We first observe that the record was due to be filed in this Court on December 11, 1978. After…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Robinson v. RobinsonTexas Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Smith v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. ThomasTexas Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Morgan Express, Inc. v. Elizabeth-Perkins, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1975
  5. Waller v. O'RearCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. O'NEAL v. County of San SabaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
  2. Gilbert v. SingletonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981
  3. Benson v. Grayson County Child Welfare, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1983
  4. I. A. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API