Legal Opinion

Westphal v. Morrow

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 31, 1988No. 4-86-2975PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

We reverse and remand for a new trial on all issues. Specifically, we believe it was error for the trial court to enter summary judgment in advance of trial on the appellant’s claim for rescission. See Durbin Paper Stock Co. v. Watson-David Insurance Co., 167 So.2d 34 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964); Erwin v. Scholfield, 416 So.2d 478 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982); Wolfe v. Aetna Insurance Co., 436 So.2d 997 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983).

We decline to rule on the other issues raised on appeal because we consider them moot in light of our reversal on the summary judgment issue and direction that there be a new trial.

DOWNEY,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Durbin Paper Stock Co. v. Watson-David Insurance CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
  2. Erwin v. ScholfieldDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  3. Wolfe v. Aetna Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Brown v. PowellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  2. Westphal v. MorrowDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API