Audubon Society v. Land Conservation & Development Commission
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtButtler, P. J.
Petitioners seek review of LCDC’s acknowledgment of the parts of Benton County’s comprehensive plan and land use regulations which relate to the Jackson-Frazier Wetland.1 Petitioners argue that the county provisions violate Goal 5 and OAR 660-16-000 et seq. We agree and reverse.
The affected area consists of approximately 158 acres and contains a unique combination of plant species. Intervenor Dapp is the owner of approximately 117 acres in the Wetland. All parties agree that the area is a “resource site,” subject to Goal 5, and it has been included as such on the county’s Goal 5 inventory.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- 1000 Friends v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- 1000 Friends v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
- Coats v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
- 1000 Friends v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
- 1000 Friends v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
3Cited by1 opinion
- Lane County v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1997