Legal Opinion

Evans v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 22, 1983No. 82-2380Published

1Opinion of the Court

DANIEL S. PEARSON, Judge.

The trial court’s denial of Evans’ claim for relief under Rule 3.850 is affirmed. Evans’ claim that he was entitled to be man-datorily classified and sentenced as a youthful offender under the then applicable provision of Section 958.04(2), Florida Statutes (Supp.1978), see Stancil v. State, 405 So.2d 426 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981), is patently without merit in that a person, as Evans, simultaneously convicted of more than one felony is not entitled to mandatory classification, State v. Goodson, 403 So.2d 1337 (Fla.1981), under either of the felonies, Abram v. State, 408…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. GoodsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1981
  2. Flores v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  3. Abram v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1981
  4. Stancil v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  5. Barnhill v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API