Legal Opinion

Costa v. Doehla

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 2, 2011No. 3D10-2825Published

1Per curiam

Appellants, the defendants below, seek review of an “Order Granting Plaintiffs Motion to Strike Affirmative Defenses or for Judgment on the Pleadings or alternatively for summary Judgment” and a subsequent order denying their motion for rehearing. Because we conclude that we lack jurisdiction to hear this appeal, we are compelled to dismiss the appeal. See Dixon v. Allstate Ins. Co., 609 So.2d 71 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); Northcutt v. Pathway Fin., 555 So.2d 868 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); Smith v. Glisson, 468 So.2d 894 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985).

Significantly, the order on appeal concludes with the following…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dixon v. Allstate Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  2. Downs v. StockmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  3. Weed v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API