Ex Parte State
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Concurrence
I concur specially for two reasons. First, I believe that it would be unjust to require the defendant to submit a written instruction on the lesser included offenses under the facts of this case. Prior to the trial court's charging the jury, the defendant's attorney asked the court to charge on the lesser included offenses. The court replied, "All right." Accordingly, the defendant was justified in relying on the trial court's agreement to so charge. However, the trial court did not give the charge and the defendant objected to the failure to charge on the lesser offenses. Under these facts I…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Giles v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1983
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1974
- City of Birmingham v. WrightSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980
- Reynolds v. McEwenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982
- Ballard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1984
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.