Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. v. Broeker

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 6, 1928PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

* Corpus Juris-Cyc. References: Licenses, 37CJ, section 6, p. 169, n. 43; p. 170, n. 44, 47; section 8, p. 171, n. 54; section 25, p. 182, n. 5; Municipal Corporations, 43CJ, section 1016, p. 623, n. 27; Statutes, 36Cyc, p. 1106, n. 29; p. 1128, n. 55; p. 1131, n. 75; p. 1151, n. 47. This is a proceeding by quo warranto, instituted at the information of the Prosecuting Attorney of St. Charles county, in his official capacity, against Henry Broeker, as respondent, having for its purpose the ouster of the latter from the office of mayor of the city of St. Charles, a city of the third class.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Columbia National Bank v. DavisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1926
  2. Viquesney v. City of KansasSupreme Court of Missouri · 1924
  3. Betz v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1926
  4. Consolidated School District No. 1 v. HackmannSupreme Court of Missouri · 1924
  5. Palmer v. OmerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1927

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Leggett v. Missouri State Life Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1960
  2. City of Wellston v. SBC Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2006
  3. Wilhoit v. City of SpringfieldMissouri Court of Appeals · 1943
  4. City of Poplar Bluff v. Poplar Bluff Loan & Building Ass'nMissouri Court of Appeals · 1963
  5. Boswell v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API