Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. City of Negaunee

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 1897PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from Marquette; Stone, J. Bill by Samuel Mitchell and others against the city of Negaunee, the Arbuckle-Ryan Company, and the Ft. Wayne Electric Corporation, to restrain the carrying out of certain contracts for the establishment of an electric light plant. From a decree dismissing the bill, complainants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

The city of Negaunee has a population of about 6,000 people. In 1896 it made a contract with the Arbuckle-Ryan Co. for a steam plant complete, for $3,474. At the same time it made a contract with the Ft. Wayne Electric Corporation for an electric plant complete, at a cost of $6,500. This proceeding is brought by the complainants, who are large taxpayers, to restrain the carrying out of these contracts. The circuit judge, after hearing the proofs in open court, dismissed the bill. Complainants appeal, assigning as grounds of their appeal:

1. The contracts were vitiated by the fraudulent conduct…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Morford v. UngerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1859
  2. Merrill v. HumphreyMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Rushville Gas Co. v. City of RushvilleIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  4. City of Crawfordsville v. BradenIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Opinion of the Justices to the House of RepresentativesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. City of Traverse City v. Township of BlairMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Hodgins v. Bay CityMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Porto Rico Telephone Co. v. Tribunal de ContribucionesSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1960
  4. Chandler v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Wolgamood v. Village of ConstantineMichigan Supreme Court · 1942

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API