Legal Opinion

Faller v. Ranger

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1904PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal by the plain tiff, Sophie Faller, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 22d day of July, 1904, denying the plaintiff’s motion to compel the defendant to accept service of plaintiff’s bill of particulars.

1Opinion of the Court

O’Brien, J.:

The defendant made a motion for a bill of particulars, which was granted, and thereafter, in compliance with the order directing the same, the plaintiff served a bill of particulars, service of which was *375admitted, but on the following day the defendant returned it with a notice that it was insufficient and defective. Thereafter the plaintiff moved to compel the defendant to accept the bill, which motion was denied, and it is from the order entered upon the denial of such motion that the plaintiff appeals.

This presents purely a question of practice. Upon the service of the bill of…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Reader v. HagginAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
  2. Smith v. Bradstreet Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
  3. Thoma v. KoeppenCity of New York Municipal Court · 1930
  4. Hosner v. KeahonNew York Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Pollack v. WieinerAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1907

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API