Anderson v. State

Appellant was charged by affidavit in three counts with the crime of pandering, as defined by §2356a Burns 1914.

He filed a motion .to quash the affidavit, as a whole, on the grounds that the facts stated do not constitute a public offense, and that the offense is not stated with sufficient certainty.

He filed a motion for a continuance, which was overruled, and upon a plea of not guilty, he was tried by a jury and found guilty, “as charged in the affidavit.”

He then filed a motion in arrest of judgment, which attacked the sufficiency of the affidavit as a whole.

After filing his motion in arrest…