Legal Opinion · Dissent

Lorusso v. Members Mutual Insurance Co.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 30, 1980No. B-8503Published

1DissentSteakley, Justice

I respectfully dissent.

Consuelo Serna Lorusso sued' Armando Valdez, Jr., for personal injuries resulting from an automobile accident. She joined her insurance carrier, Members Mutual, alleging that Valdez was uninsured and thus, as to this, invoked her policy coverage. Members Mutual filed a third party action against Valdez for indemnity. Before selection of the jury, Lorusso, who was allowed six peremptory jury challenges, objected to the allowance by the trial court of six peremptory challenges each to Valdez and Members Mutual, the two parties aligned on the opposing side. The following…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Patterson Dental Co. v. DunnTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Tamburello v. WelchTexas Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Perkins v. FreemanTexas Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Tuloma Gas Products Company v. LehmbergCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
  5. Lorusso v. Members Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API