Legal Opinion
Mulder v. PCS Health Systems, Inc.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided July 17, 2003No. CIV.A. 98-1003 (WGB)PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BASSLER, District Judge.
This class action litigation concerns alleged breaches of fiduciary duty under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001, et seq., by Defendant PCS Health Systems, Inc. (“PCS”). Plaintiff Ed Mulder (“Mulder”) moves the Court to certify a plaintiff class consisting of “all PCS beneficiaries covered by ERISA during the period from March 5, 1995 to March 5, 1998 (the ‘Class Period’).” (PI. Mem. at 2.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court declines to certify a class as broad as that requested by Mulder, but grants…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Mertens v. Hewitt AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Pegram v. HerdrichSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Agostino v. Quest Diagnostics Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2009
- Bickley Ex Rel. Georgia Pacific Corp. Life Health & Accident Plan v. Caremark Rx, Inc.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2004
- Mehling v. New York Life InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
- Graden v. Conexant Systems, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2008
- Dann v. LINCOLN NATIONAL CORP.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.