Legal Opinion
Kim v. State
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided May 1, 2000No. S00A0144PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Fletcher, Presiding Justice.
The State of Georgia filed a petition to abate a nuisance and for injunctive relief against Myung Kim as the owner and operator of the Hong Kong Spa. She contends that the trial court erred in consolidating the interlocutory and final hearing for injunctive relief. Because the trial court did not abuse its discretion in advancing the trial on the merits and consolidating it with the hearing on the interlocutory injunction, we affirm.
The district attorney filed the petition in April 1999 against Kim, the owner of the property where the spa was located, and the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- 20/20 Vision Center, Inc. v. HudgensSupreme Court of Georgia · 1986
- Cawthon v. Douglas CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
- Dortch v. Atlanta Journal & Atlanta ConstitutionSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
- Gwinnett County v. VaccaroSupreme Court of Georgia · 1989
- Williams v. TrittSupreme Court of Georgia · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Focus Entertainment International, Inc. v. Partridge Greene, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
- Meacham v. Franklin-Heard County Water AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
- Georgia Department of Agriculture v. Griffin IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
- John Faaborg v. Columbia CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2025
- Rabon v. BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 2002