Legal Opinion

Kristen Mendez v. Jack Stoller and Dawn Hill-Kearse

District Court, D. South Carolina

Decided June 10, 2026No. 6:26-cv-01959Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA GREENVILLE DIVISION Kristen Mendez, ) ) Plaintiff, ) Civil Action 6:26-cv-01959-TMC ) v. ) ) ORDER Jack Stoller and Dawn Hill-Kearse, ) ) Defendants. ) _________________________________) Plaintiff, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, (ECF No. 6), filed this civil action, asserting the following allegations against the named defendants: (1) “Defendant Dawn Hill- Kearse delayed work”; and (2) “Defendant Jack Stoller tolerated misconduct.” (ECF No. 1). Now before the court is the magistrate judge’s1 report and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Mathews v. WeberSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. David E. Camby v. Larry Davis James M. LesterCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983
  4. Bruce Beaudett v. City of Hampton City Attorneys A. Paul Burton and W. Stephen Moore Judge T.H. Wilson, II and Judge Nelson T. OvertonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
  5. United States v. Nicholas Omar MidgetteCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2007

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API