Legal Opinion

Hendricks v. N.Y., N.H. H.R.R. Co.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 11, 1929PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiff was an employee of defendant engaged in interstate commerce. In an action instituted under the Federal Employers' Liability Act, he recovered judgment for personal injuries. It has been reversed as matter of law and the complaint dismissed. The majority of the Appellate Division held that defendant did not fail in its duty to protect him and that, moreover, at the time of his injury he had deviated from his employment. We are unable to accept either theory.

After the close of working hours, plaintiff was given free transportation by defendant to the station nearest his home. The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad Company v. WinfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Pallocco v. . Lehigh Valley R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1923
  3. Knowles v. . N.Y., N.H. H.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1918

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sassaman v. Pennsylvania R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1944
  2. London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. FrazeeUtah Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Richard Haynes v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, a Corporation, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2020
  4. Sassaman v. Pennsylvania R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1944
  5. Sassaman v. Pennsylvania R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API