Legal Opinion
Murray v. McNamara
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided March 20, 2015No. 2013-630PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBassett, J.
The defendants, Keith McNamara, Shirley Benton, and Jerel Benton, appeal: (1) a jury verdict in favor of the plaintiffs, Richard and Mary Murray, on their claim that the defendants breached the implied warranty of workmanlike quality; (2) an order of the Superior Court (Vaughan, J.) denying their motion to dismiss the plaintiffs’ New Hampshire Consumer Protection Act (CPA) claim, see RSA ch. 358-A (2009 & Supp. 2014); and (3) an order of the Superior Court (Bomstein, J.) finding that the defendants violated the CPA when they built the plaintiffs’ home with latent structural defects that…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Lempke v. DagenaisSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
- Moulton v. Groveton Papers Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974
- Hair Excitement, Inc. v. L'Oreal U.S.A., Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
- In the Matter of the Liquidation of The Home Insurance CompanySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2014
- Granite State Management & Resources v. City of ConcordSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2013
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Halifax-Am. Energy Co. v. Provider Power, LLCSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2018
- Campbell v. CGMDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2017
- Lewis B. Sykes, Jr. v. RBS Citizens, N.A., et al.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2015
- Patrick Short, et al. v. Civ. Amerada Hess Corp. et al.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2019