Legal Opinion

Anchorage Nissan, Inc. v. State

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided July 18, 1997No. S-7119PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EASTAUGH, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

A civil jury found that Anchorage Nissan, Inc. (ANI) committed unfair or deceptive business acts involving the sale of new or used vehicles. ANI asserts on appeal that the superior court committed various errors before and during trial. We affirm.

II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

In August 1993 the State of Alaska filed suit against ANI and several of its employees, alleging violations of the Alaska Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Act, AS 45.50.471 (the Act). 1 The complaint described the sale by ANI of a 1991 Ford Escort to Charles and Mary…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. D. S. W. ex rel. R. M. W. v. Fairbanks North Star Borough School DistrictAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Miller v. SearsAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Public Defender Agency v. Superior Court, Third Judicial DistrictAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Beck v. State, Department of Transportation & Public FacilitiesAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Moloso v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1982

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. City of Fairbanks v. RiceAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Tillmon v. TillmonAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Marsingill v. O'MALLEYAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Kay v. Danbar, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Blair v. Federal Insurance CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 2018

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API