Primus v. Johnson
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
SPECIAL TERM OPINION
WOZNIAK, Chief Judge.
FACTS
Appellants’ attorney made a reference to an insurance company in his opening statement at trial. Because of this reference, the trial court ordered a mistrial and awarded respondents their costs and disbursements. Appellants seek review of the order granting a mistrial and the judgment awarding costs and disbursements. This court questioned jurisdiction and directed the parties to file memoranda on the ap-pealability of the order and judgment. Respondents move to dismiss the appeal.
DECISION
The granting of a new trial for misconduct of counsel is a…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Erickson v. Hinckley Municipal Liquor StoreCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Cashman v. MatsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970